On 08.08.2013 10:05, Gerd Radecke wrote:
> We're using the new use_transactions and enable_socket_queue and from
> the buffer log message I see, and the data actuality in icinga-web I'd
> say ido2db is doing fine.
well, inserting data is one thing. consuming memory and cpu is another
one. you might wanna increase your level of local monitoring
("monitoring the icinga host" @ wiki) and report back then.
>
> I will try 1.9.3 and see if that helps.
>
> For the sake of my understanding though: If ido2db had problems,
> should that slow down icinga? Unless ido2db slows down the whole
> machine (which I couldn't see yet) - is there a way it can directly
> affect icinga performance?
Previously without the asynchronous queue I would have said yes. But now
it shouldn't interfere with Icinga - it just may consume system
ressources which may affect Icinga badly.
It's more of a guess. maybe some performance graphs over time will tell
some more obvious trends on the situation.
--
DI (FH) Michael Friedrich
mail: michael.friedr...@gmail.com
twitter: https://twitter.com/dnsmichi
jabber: dnsmi...@jabber.ccc.de
irc: irc.freenode.net/icinga dnsmichi
icinga open source monitoring
position: lead core developer
url: https://www.icinga.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users
