On 27 September 2013 10:55, Michael Friedrich
<michael.friedr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 27.09.2013 19:40, James Nedila wrote:
> > On 27 September 2013 00:56, Michael Friedrich
> > <michael.friedr...@gmail.com <mailto:michael.friedr...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > And is there a list somewhere of exactly what DB tables fall
> > under each
> > > Data Processing Option flag?
> >
> > see https://dev.icinga.org/issues/4479 && (test git 'next' || wait
> > for 1.10)
> >
> >
> > This is perfect, and exactly what I was looking for.
> > I'll update to the latest release and patch this in.
>
> lemme know how it goes - my tests worked fine though.
>
>
As a quick update, this patch definitely helped.
We use custom variables heavily, and updates to the customvariablestatus
table were taking up approx 40% of our DB queries.
After applying the patch to 1.9.3, our DB load dropped considerably.
Thanks a bunch for your help!
> btw - in the future, please create a new mail thread (click on new mail,
> instead of reply changing the topic). right now your thread is linked
> below "[icinga-devel] Icinga redesign".
>
>
That's strange, as I was just replying to this email... I didn't
consciously change the topic.
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users
