--- In [email protected], "Aria Rajasa Masna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sudah ada yang melihat ini: > > http://wiseheartdesign.com/2006/12/6/rails-needs-something-better-than-engines/ > > Sangat menarik sepertinya, here's a quote: > > One of the things that Django does better than Rails at the moment is that > > it encourages you to subdivide your application according to components. In > > Django terms you don't just create an "application" you create a Django > > "project" which contains multiple "apps". An app is a full slice of the > > application and contains models, views, and controllers (actually in Django > > terms it contains "models", "templates", and "views", but it is essentially > > the same thing). > > > > Django's model is perfect for Web sites because you can have mini apps for > > the admin, blog, and forum, and maybe one for that extremely custom event > > registration system that you have. Of course the great thing about this is > > that you can share these little mini apps across applications. > > > Setelah melihat ini, saya jadi menginstall Rails > Engine<http://rails-engines.org/>, > Tapi sampai sekarang masih belum pernah mencobanya. Ada yang pernah? > > -- > <a href="http://sharingfoto.com";>Sharingfoto.com</a> > Tempat kamu berbagi dan berkreasi dengan fotomu! > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
btw ini yg ngadain Chicago Ruby User Group kan... weheheh dah nonton loncat2 ^_^, durasinya lama banget ... 3 jam, sayang karena bhs inggris ku jelek jadi ndak terlalu paham apa yg DHH dan Andy siapa gituh.... diskusikan
