Concurrent Ruby. http://rubyforge.org/projects/cruby
But why? If you need concurrent magic, go to true functional programming. This is Ruby. Not Java. Nor CLR. NOT to be everything for everyone is Ruby's greatest strength. On 10/30/07, Hendy Irawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Edwin Pratomo wrote: > > SEVEN REASONS I SWITCHED BACK TO C AFTER 2 YEARS ON RAILS: > > > > #1 - ???IS THERE ANYTHING RAILS/RUBY CAN DO THAT C CAN???T DO? ??? > > (thinking)??? NO.??? > > > > #2 - OUR ENTIRE COMPANY???S STUFF WAS IN C: DON???T UNDERESTIMATE > INTEGRATION > > > > #3 - DON???T WANT WHAT I DON???T NEED > > > > #4 - IT???S SMALL AND FAST > > > > #5 - IT???S BUILT TO MY TASTES > > > > #6 - I LOVE SQL > > > > #7 - PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES ARE LIKE GIRLFRIENDS: THE NEW ONE IS BETTER > > BECAUSE *YOU* ARE BETTER > > > > sorry uppercase, sengaja :-D > > > > rgds, > > Edwin. > > > > > both true and a nice parody :) > > I wish Ruby can already do concurrent programming easily like Erlang, > though, so maybe one day I can add one more reason to go back to C: > > > " I MISS MY THREADS AND DEADLOCKS AND RACE CONDITIONS AND COUNTLESS > MULTITHREADED DEBUGGING SESSIONS !!! " > > > =)) > > -- > Hendy Irawan > www.hendyirawan.com > > -- http://andryshuzain.com
