I'm quite happy to prepare a patch for 2.7; one possibility is to make a diff from the 2.7 version of vidle. I guess I misinterpreted your comments about 32/64 etc. I'll be out of touch for the next couple days. I'm really excited about a two-day visit to Zuni Pueblo (New Mexico).
Bruce Sherwood On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Ned Deily <n...@acm.org> wrote: > In article > <aanlktikmm543mev7mjqcanpxoyjk1gkvnmz3atvp6...@mail.gmail.com>, > Bruce Sherwood <bashe...@ncsu.edu> wrote: > >> Ned Deily's note (repeated here) made me think that I should not >> submit a patch for 2.7 because he has reason to believe that the >> problems aren't with IDLE. > > I think the question of whether Guilherme's enhancements should go into > 2.7 is independent of the "quit" problem, which I was unaware of until > it was brought by here earlier today. I agree with Terry's comment > regarding 2.7; if you are willing to make a 2.7 patch, my vote would be > to submit it. And if there are other bugs that people know of, it would > be more helpful to open bug tracker issues for them rather than tweeting > about them. > > -- > Ned Deily, > ...@acm.org > > _______________________________________________ > IDLE-dev mailing list > IDLE-dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/idle-dev > _______________________________________________ IDLE-dev mailing list IDLE-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/idle-dev
