On 2011-02-03 01:29:23 -0500, Terry Reedy said:
On 2/2/2011 6:22 PM, Robert wrote:
On 2011-02-02 17:18:41 -0500, Corey Richardson said:
Considering that all non-bugfix changes aren't being accepted for Python
2, this would be strictly Python 3.
I was thinking that as well. The Python class that I am taking is all P3
and has Tkinter stuff in it. :-)
Since IDLE is not really library code, but an application, one could
argue that the no new feature rule should not necessarily apply. But I
personally would only make that argument for 3.2. I will ask on pydev
when there is code to argue over.
I no no interest at present in backporting to 2.7. One reasone is that
once 3.2 is out, I think most new Python programmers should start with that.
I would agree with going with 3.x going forward. I am going to be
taking some classes
and P3 is all they teach. :)
--
Robert
_______________________________________________
IDLE-dev mailing list
IDLE-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/idle-dev
