On 13 June 2014 16:58, Tal Einat <talei...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Saimadhav Heblikar > <saimadhavhebli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Just a heads up to both: I am writing a keyseq validator method. >> It currently works for over 800 permutations of ['Shift', 'Control', >> 'Alt', 'Meta', 'Key-a', 'Key-A', 'Up', 'Key-Up', 'a', 'A']. It works >> for permutations of length 2 and 3. Beyond that its not worth it IMO. >> I am currently trying to integrate it with test_configuration.py and >> catching permutations i missed out. >> >> I post this, so that we dont duplicate work. I hope it to be ready by >> the end of the day.(UTC +5.5) > > What is the method you are using?
Regex. It is not something elegant. The permutations are coded in.(Not all 800+ obviously, but around 15-20 general ones.). The only advantage is it can be used without creating a new Tk instance. > > What do you mean by "permutations"? If you mean what I think, then I'm > not sure I agree with >3 not being worth it. I've used keyboard > bindings with more than 2 modifiers before, and we should certainly > support this properly. > I am sorry. I meant to write >3 modifier permutations. (i.eControl-Shift-Alt-Meta+Key-X is not covered. But Control-Shift-Alt-Key-X is.) -- Regards Saimadhav Heblikar _______________________________________________ IDLE-dev mailing list IDLE-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/idle-dev
