At 08.48 -0500 01-01-06, J. William Semich wrote: >Not to mention it would be hard for most people to remember. That was my point when I said that people would try to use the original IDN version. >It looks a lot simpler to put "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" on your >business card as the "ASCII alternative", and probably is much >easier to remember. But, that would not work if not the top level domain "48" exists. If it was an IPv4 address literal you wanted to write it is syntactically wrong (you forgot the '[' and ']') and even if that was what you wanted that would not work either as the IP address change quite often for my mail host. paf
- Re: [idn] An experiment wi... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] An experime... Marco d'Itri
- Re: [idn] An expe... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] An experime... Martin J. Duerst
- Re: [idn] An expe... ned . freed
- Re: [idn] An experiment with UTF-8... owner-idn
- Re: [idn] An experiment with U... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] An experiment with U... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] An experiment wi... Martin J. Duerst
- Re: [idn] An experiment wi... J. William Semich
- RE: [idn] An experime... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- RE: [idn] An expe... Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: [idn] An experime... Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: [idn] An experiment with U... D. J. Bernstein c/o James Seng
- Re: [idn] An experiment with UTF-8 domain n... James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] An experiment with UTF-8 domain n... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] An experiment with UTF-8 domain n... Dan
- Re: [idn] An experiment with UTF-8 dom... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] An experiment with UTF-8 dom... Mark Davis
- [idn] Where will we see bad domain... D. J. Bernstein c/o James Seng
- RE: [idn] Where will we see ba... Jonathan Rosenne
