> As I said, I don't see any serious support for the ACE-now-and-forever > position. That's because you are establishing a false dichotomy between "ACE now and forever" on one hand and "UTF-8 eventually" on the other. There's a lot of middle ground between those two, which I might characterize as "ACE in the near-term, and as for eventually, wait-and-see what makes sense" And "what makes sense" might be different from one protocol to another. Keith
- [idn] RFC2026 - Section 10 Statement J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] RFC2026 - Section 10 Statem... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] RFC2026 - Section 10 S... James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] RFC2026 - Section 10 Statem... Jorge Amodio
- Re: [idn] Planning ahead for good IDNs D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Planning ahead for good IDNs Marc Tamsky
- Re: [idn] Planning ahead for good IDNs J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] Planning ahead for good IDNs William Morris
- Re: [idn] Planning ahead for good IDNs Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Planning ahead for good IDNs D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Planning ahead for good IDN... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Planning ahead for good IDNs Keith Moore
