> What I don't like in your arguments is the focus on protocol specs as > religious objects, rather than as tools to help implementors provide > working software to system administrators and users. and apparently your personal definition of "working" is one that requires nearly everyone on the network to upgrade their software (and perhaps even hardware), at your whim, and on your schedule - or risk breaking critical functionality not only for themselves but for others as well. it's a rather strange use of the word. Keith
- [idn] Some comments Dan
- Re: [idn] Some comments Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Some comments D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Some comments Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Some comments D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Some comments Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Some comments Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Some comme... Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] Some c... William Morris
- Re: [idn] Some c... Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] Some c... ned . freed
- Re: [idn] Some c... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Some c... Dave Crocker
- [idn] ACE, ACE-UTF-8, UTF-8 GIM Gyeongseog-KIM Kyongsok
- Re: [idn] ACE, ACE-UTF-8, UTF... James Seng/Personal
