> The application-only solutions proposed are clearly easier to > implement than the infrastructure solutions, I don't believe you. We need facts about the actual deployment costs, not buzzwords like ``application-only.'' I've started a web page at http://cr.yp.to/proto/idn.html to tally the costs of the proposals. Specific contributions are welcome. > However, we cannot simply put binary characters into the current DNS > without breaking many protocols and many DNS servers. Give us the details. Exactly which pieces of software break, and how? ---Dan
- [idn] The report from the design team Marc Blanchet
- Re: [idn] The report from the design team D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] The report from the design team Marc Tamsky
- Re: [idn] The report from the design team Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] The report from the design team Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] The report from the design team Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] The report from the design team James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] The report from the design team Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] The report from the design team Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] The report from the design team Patrik F�ltstr�m
