>>>>> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:27:36 -0500, Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Dan, [...] > ACE seems to have a lower risk of failure. I guess we'll now need an examination of whether: (a) There is a need to assess the risk of failure for each proposal. and (b) What the criteria for measuring the "risk of failure" is. The arguments that follow are obvious, if (a) then (b) needs to be answered. If (a) is false, then forget (b) and stop waving that flag. Marc.
- [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes Sung Jae Shim
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Note... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes Marc Tamsky
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Note... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Who does what (Re: [idn] San Diego Meetin... Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Who does what (Re: [idn] San Dieg... Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: Who does what (Re: [idn] San... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] San Diego Meeting Notes James Seng/Personal
