> It's not that "ACE" didn't start out at ISO that is of concern. > It's the fact that the "ACE"s have an extremenly narrow field > if applicability (IDNs) that is of concern. agreed that it's a narrow field of applicability, but it's an important one for what we're trying to solve. UTF-8 might be quite flexible, but it doesn't let us transmit domain names in the ASCII-only fields that most existing protocols and applications were written to expect. Keith
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Mark Davis
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Steve Hanna
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Mark Davis
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Kenneth Whistler
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Keith Moore
- RE: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Patrik F�ltstr�m
- RE: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Russ Rolfe
- RE: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] UNIX moving to UTF-8 Keith Moore
