At 12:39 09/03/2001 +0900, Bruce Thomson wrote: >Nameprep can and probably will be implemented at the >application level. Microsoft already prepends www. and >appends .com if I leave them off. They can handle this >kind of thing. But what is the pressure to put it in the spec? as you say, all implementations can, and probably will, handle "this kind of thing". But if two implementations do it differently, they will look up different domain names. That's the whole reason. -- Harald Tveit Alvestrand, [EMAIL PROTECTED] +47 41 44 29 94 Personal email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Bruce Thomson
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Bruce Thomson
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Bruce Thomson
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Bruce Thomson
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Thoughts on nameprep Patrik F�ltstr�m
