At 01:56 AM 3/20/01 +0900, Yoshiro YONEYA wrote:
>From: "James Seng/Personal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [idn] Internet Draft uname.txt
>Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 19:07:44 +0800
>
>> Internationalized Domain Names and Unique Identifiers/Names
>
<snip>
Hence, we would create the following Resource Records within the name server.
In the Resource Records, it would look like this:
ML1 UNAME ACE1
ML2 UNAME ACE1
ML3 UNAME ACE1
ML3 UNAME ACE1
ACE1 IN A 1.2.3.4.
IN A 1.2.3.4.
A "UNAME" Resource Record is shown here. In practice, it could be CNAME
(except CNAME is unable to handle MX).
-------------------------------------------------------
What is the explanation for using the (not-yet-developed) "UNAME" RR type
instead of the currently available DNAME (in BIND 9)?
Bill Semich
