Paul, While I don't disagree (or agree) with any proposed course of action (yet), I missed the controlling issue which requires a working group process event, e.g., a decision, on or before a date, e.g., Tuesday. Could you expand on your comment? Here it is for clarity: > The WG should decide before Tuesday what it wants to do about the > protocol given WALID's previous actions, inactions, and this current > statement. Cheers, Eric
Re: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Statement
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine Sat, 28 Apr 2001 08:31:06 -0700
- Re: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Statement James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Stat... Rick H Wesson
- [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Statemen... J. Douglas Hawkins
- Re: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Stat... Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Stat... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Stat... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Stat... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Stat... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Stat... Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Stat... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- RE: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Stat... Russ Rolfe
- RE: [idn] WALID, Inc. IP Stat... Dave Crocker
