Dan writes: > The people saying ACE/IDNA say it is quickest and least disruptive > to non-IDN aware software. Those wanting UTF-8 thinks this format > is best for internationalisation and fear that starting with IDNA > will result in ACE forever. I have a much more serious concern: the short-term costs of deploying ACE appear to be much larger than the total costs of moving directly to UTF-8. See http://cr.yp.to/proto/idn.html for details. ---Dan
- [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 Dan
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 Dan
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 Mats Dufberg
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Let's go forward with IDNA and UTF-8 Mats Dufberg
