> Keith again complains that UTF-8 might not ``work well for some > important languages.'' once again, misrepresenting my statements. you're absolutely right - there's no point in us arguing about such things. Keith
- [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs C C Magnus Gustavsson
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Sean X. Zhang
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs liana . ydisg
