> This excludes proposals to redesign Unicode from scratch, for example, > and it excludes Keith's 7-bit-forever proposals. I haven't made any such proposal. then again, you haven't made a proposal either. for once, you are applying the same delusions to others that you apply to yourself. I suppose that is an improvement. Keith
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs C C Magnus Gustavsson
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Sean X. Zhang
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Bruce Thomson
- RE: [idn] Dots, and a path to working IDNs Brian W. Spolarich
