IETF idn working group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [idn] Re: Document Status? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:34:26PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Soobok Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I often run xterm and then launch MUTT (or PINE). > > Even if MUTT would become IDNA-aware in the future, copy & paste operations > > grab the IDN-like strings directly from the xterm, not from the MUTT. > > So, the MUTT cannot have any opportunity to toss ACE-encod the IDN into the > > receiving applications or the clip board area. Text-based MUA does not have > > any copy&paste support to/from it. Xterm does all the job. > > The specifications seems quite clear on what should happen here -- if > there is no negotiation, ACE should be used. TTY MUAs therefor must > display ACE strings as there is no negotiation between xterm and the > MUA that an IDNA string is being displayed. Dear Simon, Oops. Then I will encounter very ugly environment in the near future. Dear idn-ers, Please tell me that simon's understanding is wrong. Negotiation in IDNA draft seems either poorly documented or poorly understood. Korean mutt user.
