Hi,
We receive several comments about the agenda regarding giving timeslot
to presenters who does not have an I-D. General feeling is "no I-D, no
timeslot".
The concern raised can be summaried as follows:
a) Without I-D, the proposal may be a moving target.
b) Without I-D, the presenter may not conform to RFC2026 wrt to IPR.
c) Without I-D, WG partipants may not know the topic in advance and
hence we waste valuable face-time at IETF.
Marc & myself will discuss this further and will make a decision fairly
soon. However, in the meantime, I would recommend that all presenters
who does not have an I-D to
1) Try to send your prelimary I-D to mailing list ASAP. It is okay if
it is not complete. You can send an update later.
2) Please state the IPR issues with your I-D/presentation. Please kindly
read RFC2026.
3) If you are discussing about an implementation, please try to focus
on the proposal protocol and not on your own implementation.
Thanks!
-James "speaking as co-chair" Seng
