Re: [idn] Suggested clarifications of the IDN requirements doc

[James Seng]

Dave Crocker wrote:
> The original wording is strange, since IDNS does not have "IPv4 features"
> or "IPv6 features".  Both those protocols work fine without DNS or
> IDNS.  Presumably the intention is:
> 
>          "The protocol must work for all features of IDNS."

I prefer the wording 

"The IDN protocol MUST work for all features of DNS."

(This includes all IPv4, IPv6, DNSSEC and any new RR coming into DNS)

-James Seng