Re: [idn] Unicode tagging

[Paul Hoffman / IMC]

At 6:21 PM -0400 8/15/00, RJ Atkinson wrote:
>I must be confused, but I thought we'd already settled on using
>ISO-10646 and using the UTF-8 encoding on the wire, so those
>other specs and variations are irrelevant at this point, right ?

You must be confused. There is nothing about that in the requirements 
document. There are proposals in front of the working group for other 
encodings.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium