Re: [idn] UTC feedback

[Keith Moore]

> That aside, the proposed workaround is unreasonable in languages where
> a character without its accent is really different from a character
> with its accent. 

presumably, in those languages, you would not register the different 
spellings of a label (with and without accents) - you would only 
register the correct spelling.

a registry has an intersting policy question if it is faced with 
requests to register two labels in the same zone, which are in
different languages, when there's a conflict according to the rules 
of one language but not the other.  

Keith