There are several ways to provide "multilingual" capabilities
and many TLD registrars have selected a methodology. Why
pick on this one when NU, CN, JP, KR, et.al. have followed
similar paths. Just because a method is not an IETF
"approved technical specification" does not mean that it
is not defined.
--bill
All the TLD registrars agree that IETF is the best place to define
IDN standard, at least I know CN, JP, KR and TW agree to adopt
IETF specification when things are available. Even the technology which
developed by the TLD registrars is changing. From TLD registrars'
point of view, they are exploring the IDN possibility through limited
resources, budge...etc,. It's difficult to say whether this kind of
exploration has defined the technology.
Kenny Huang
Secretariat
JET (Joint Engineering Team)
JP,TW,KR,CN
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Kenneth Whistler
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fw... Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Kenneth Whistler
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Bill Manning
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Bill Manning
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) James Seng
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Kenny Huang
- RE: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Hollenbeck, Scott
- RE: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) J. William Semich
- RE: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Patrik F�ltstr�m
- RE: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) James Seng
- RE: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Hollenbeck, Scott
- RE: [idn] NSI Multilingual Testbed Information (fwd) Paul Hoffman / IMC
