> 2) The requirements document MUST NOT presuppose that there is > at all any "ACE" (TES) used for domain names. ACE itself is not a fundamental requirement. however, ACE is very nearly implied by other fundamental requirements, some of which are not in the requirements document. among these is the need for existing applications and protocols, some of which cannot deal with other than ASCII names, to be able to exchange IDNs both within the protocol and between applications and other protocols. Keith
- [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Zita Wenzel
- RE: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Hongbo Shi
- Re: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Hongbo Shi
- RE: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Keith Moore
- RE: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Hongbo Shi
- RE: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: [idn] draft-ietf-idn-requirements-04.txt Keith Moore
- [idn] req doc: new item proposed Marc Blanchet
