Cant comment on NSI. However, I am kind of interested to know what 'i-DNS Proxy' you talking about because there i-DNS.net has no "DNS-PROXY" solution. Neither has any of our product is dependent on Netscape or IE or any platform in particular. Secondly, ML.com is a special testbed and i-DNS.net has not even release any software which is meant for ML.com yet. We are going to release certain software designed to work with ML.com when the testbed starts. So I don't know where you get these informations below and how you arrived to the conclusion. Please clarify. -James "speaking as i-DNS.net I suppose" Seng > NSI's early Resolution phase appears to need a transistion solution , i-dnx proxy. > But, i-DNS's DNS-PROXY fails to resolve > native-code ML-queries from Netscape 4.X on WIN9X plaforms > without CCS conflicts. NN on WIN9X does not speak UTF8 on HTTP and DNS queries. > It may mislead web surfers to wrong sites and may cause security problems. > It may isolate Netscape users from others, contrary to IAB's recommendation RFC 2825. > I-DNS proxy is dangerous to be deployed as a transition solution. > > Would you comment on this?
