Scott, > The approach described in the paper is a _proposal_, hence the "draft" > markings (sorry if that's not clear in the paper itself). Given the design > team's presentation this week it obviously needs to be revisited. If NSI could submit an Internet-Draft describing their whiepaper's proposal it would be a Good Thing. I'd love to see more VSGRS participation in the IDN working group. -rick
- [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution Hideyo Imazu
- Re: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution Hongbo Shi
- Re: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution Hideyo Imazu
- RE: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution Hollenbeck, Scott
- RE: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution Rick H Wesson
- RE: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution Marc Blanchet
- Re: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution Edmon
- Re: [idn] NSI whitepaper on ML Resolution James Seng/Personal
