----- Original Message -----
From: "Edmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Keith Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Soobok Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 5:59 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] ACE37,AMCW and LDUDE
>
> > I could see having a very simple reordering of codepoints in order
> > to increase the efficiency of DUDE for ideographic languages. But my
> > (admittedly biased) sense is that we're fast approaching the point
> > of diminishing returns. Just how important is it to provide for names
> > that are one or two ideographs longer?
>
> It is more than one or two... in the worst case scenario for CJK, ACE37
out
> performs DUDE by 5 characters!
No. It may be so for the worst case.
For nominal case for hangul/han domains, max length reaches 28~29 syllables.
moreover, ACE37 with REORDERING will do much more compression, i guess.
REORDERING is another compression layer applicabe to all ACEs, not for
DUDE.
