> It is difficult for me to imagine how you would add anything out of > band to finger, whois, or other "one connection, one exchange" > protoocols. What did you have in mind? Using transport-layer options to negotiate over compression, encryption, charset and other per-session characteristics. With finger, for example, the client and server could use TCP options to negotiate over the charset, without having to change the finger protocol semantics whatsoever. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- RE: [idn] Reality Check John C Klensin
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] Reality Check John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check John C Klensin
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Russ Rolfe
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Erik Nordmark
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Russ Rolfe
