On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Eric A. Hall wrote: > Just-use-ACE is actually the most succeptible to this particular problem, > since old and new applications pass data into the system through the old > APIs equally, without any distinctive markings. Was it nameprepped? nobody > knows... At least with the new API approach we know that a particular IDN > was most likely nameprepped. Implementing ACE without Nameprep wouldn't be logical, and we need not consider it any more than we consider any other mis-implementation of IDNA. Bright
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Steve Atkins
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Bright Fulton
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Why follow IDNA with UTF-8? Soobok Lee
