<sneak>Just a side remark. Given things like below, which I see daily, I don't think that using UTF-8 in mail headers will cause much more problems.</sneak>
Regards, Martin. At 08:11 01/07/17 -0700, Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote: >The original message was received at Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:11:23 -0700 (PDT) >from localhost [127.0.0.1] > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (reason: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown) > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >... while talking to sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com.: > >>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ><<< 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown >550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown >Reporting-MTA: dns; sj-msg-av-1.cisco.com >Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost >Arrival-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:11:23 -0700 (PDT) > >Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Action: failed >Status: 5.1.1 >Remote-MTA: DNS; sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com >Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown >Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:11:27 -0700 (PDT) >Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Received: from proxy3.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by sj-msg-av-1.cisco.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f6HFBNR28562 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:11:23 -0700 (PDT) >Received: from sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp (sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp [133.27.194.41]) > by proxy3.cisco.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6HFBn402614 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:11:50 -0700 (PDT) >Received: from enoshima (g055087.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [211.132.55.87]) > by sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id AAA10384; > Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:11:24 +0900 (JST) >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58.J >Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:10:52 +0900 >To: Patrik F$BgM(Btstr$B�N(B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Russ Rolfe ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Martin Duerst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Just send UTF-8 with nameprep (was: RE: [idn] RealityCheck) >In-Reply-To: <152039.995367999@localhost> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"; format=flowed >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Hello Patrick > >At 11:06 01/07/17 +0200, Patrik F$BgM(Btstr$B�N(B wrote: >>--On 01-07-17 16.48 +0900 Martin Duerst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > It is very important to understand that in most contexts, the chance >> > that a label is changed (except for lowercasing, which was part of >> > the UTF-8 proposal from the start) by nameprep when somebody takes a >> > proper domain name from paper and inputs it, is *very* small.
