Adam M. Costello wrote: >It's undeniable that ACE is more backward-compatible, and fails in fewer >instances, than any 8-bit encoding. Especially if ACE is never decoded into the non-ASCII characters it represent. The moment ACE is decoded, ACE will have the same failures that using UTF-8 would result in. Dan
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth ned . freed
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Martin Duerst
- RE: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth David R. Conrad
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Dan Oscarsson
