--On Thursday, 09 August, 2001 07:31 -0400 Edmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Dan Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> It seems to me that it would be more confusing if TC/SC behaved >> differently for different TLDs. One of the (I think >> beneficial) features of DNS is that the behavior is uniform >> across all TLDs (com works like net works like org ...) > > This is not true. Registration restrictions differ from TLD to > TLD. But a query is interpreted independent of TLD. And once the query is made, the name is resolved exactly the same way, regardless of the TLD. Those things, which are the important issues in determining whether a given name "means" the same thing to you as it does to me, are, and would be, true even if a particular domain violates the current LDH rules in the names it accepts/ registers. john
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence Edmon
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence Dan Ebert
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence ben
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence Edmon
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence Edmon
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence Edmon
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence Edmon
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence ben
- Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence Adam M. Costello
