At 10:24 01/10/22 +0900, Soobok Lee wrote:
>We have no TAGALOG characters X,Y now.
>After we finalized nameprep/ACE,
>TAGALOG script may be added to Unicode.
>Then,
>
> > My  question was that:
> >   1) newly-approved TAGALOG characters X,Y  have   NFC X -> Y,
> >   2) old Nameprep/ACE encodes X.com and Y.com as two distinct ACE labels,
>
>unassingned code points are allowed in query from old version nameprep.
>X.com Y.com are passed through into DNS servers which have no stored tagalog
>labels before TAGALOG is added, but begin to accept it after it's approved 
>& added.

That makes a lot of sense. Or do you want to say it doesn't.



> >       because it don't know about NFC X -> Y
> >   3) new Nameprep/ACE encodes X.com as the the same ACE label as
> >       Y.com's       with NFC  X -> Y.
> >
> > >   If X.com and Y.com are taken by two distinct registrants, there will
> > >     be a mess. of course, it should have be blocked by careful
> > registries.
> > >   Even if new ACE libaries are distributed, some old ACE tools will
> > still
> > >     try to send X.com dns queries which may fail.
> >
>this case is described in stringprep-00, section 6.3 paragraph 3.
>that query should fail. Old nameprep/ACE applications should send
>Y.com instead of X.com even when it gets native X.com from html page
>(human input should contain only Y.com, not X.com).

Well, it shouldn't get X.com from the webpage, because the
web page should also be normalized. Please see
http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod :-).

Regards,   Martin.



Reply via email to