At 19:05 01/10/22 +0200, Karlsson Kent - keka wrote: >And still it is not sufficient, since historic Hangul >Jamo aren't covered by the precomposed Hangul syllable >characters. I have also indications that many useful >consonant (and vowel?) clusters aren't covered as separate >(Jamo) characters, but have to be constructed from multiple >'more basic' (non-cluster) Hangu Jamo characters.
Now that's new to me. Can you provide some evidence (e.g. some scans)? I use to write my last name as a Hangul syllable as a joke, but as the 'rst' combination doesn't turn up in as a final cluster, I have to do this using graphics. So I'm familliar with the problem. But I assumed that all actual combinations that have been used historically are actually available in the Unicode Jamo block. Regards, Martin.
