> Therefore, your concerns about long path of reordering revisioning is NOT > new problem,but rather just one of never-terminaing nameprep/ACE revisioning > problem.
I think they are very different. nameprep/stringprep would probably need to be revised if there are Unicode code points added before the document becomes an RFC. My point about reordering is that it might need to be revised each time somebody requests adding support for one of the languages/scripts that are already supported in Unicode, even if Unicode doesn't add anything. I don't know how many languages/scripts that Unicode currently support but the number is presumably a few hundered. Erik
