----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:55 AM Subject: Re: [idn] Which lanuages/scripts to reorder?
> In a message dated 2001-10-23 8:36:48 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > writes: > > > Reordering won't be changed and remains as sub-optimal frequency tables > > forever without new prefix, as i repeated many time in this list. > > > > What i mean is adding NEW reordering tables for *NEW SCRIPTS* > > in accordance with new SCRIPT support in newer nameprep. > > I agree with you that reordering table for old existing scripts should not > > be changed . > > Reordering is, first and last, based on the tables. If you create new > tables, you have by definition created a new version of reordering. I don't > think you can say "reordering won't be changed" and then suggest one sentence > later that new tables could be added in the future. yes. you are right. I missed "tables" in the first sentence. " Reordering <tables> won't be changed " is the right one. Regards, Soobok Lee > > However, I'm sure everyone will at least be glad to see that existing tables > would not be touched. > > -Doug Ewell > Fullerton, California >
