-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- James Seng/Personal wrote: > Of the people participate in the reordering discussion > [snip] > David Hopwood - (no conclusion from comments)
Make that an explicit objection - I think it's far too complicated to justify the marginal benefits. Also, any changes or additions to reordering would have disastrous consequences for name comparison, and Soobok Lee's zq--/uq-- proposal does not fix this. - -- David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/ RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01 Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBO9Xd1TkCAxeYt5gVAQH3Zwf+LohUgxC4xfXulqSzQbzBGb/GYkHkE7di rGpy7qcujsmoW9PPIcGkCppUvyQatxmGSkV9v4STyR1+sD1ea8XMXQy+I8hY7F4r 6oKYA6UMzXTwhIaZ3HPe0nAWjmbF59w/1WjGPFP2GJuu0Ol5+ZwF686DCDOoPNc+ upkF05YuXFUwS7L99RR+0w1CGkOmdoj3Cl577sXJ36WMNj760yG5Gd29KjfT3ucl 8Yk6KjaynT0ppDcX1ZIay5e0BAGmHbrlcaGmRYTXodWMvoNhP4JHuJvW6dfMrY1t 4qJJcTfFsj1qSV3fDZRbCqczIY0gYYxzsCyJbILmGHNndi26cE4wyw== =FF+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
