> >>LEGACY: the source characters are *only* intended to be used for > >> round-trip mappings from legacy charsets. > > > >I do not understand what you want to do with those. > >Do you suggest outlawing this category? > > Yes. IDN is a new system, with the goal of being able to > represent labels in a wide range of scripts. There is no > need to allow artefacts of legacy character encodings, > because IDN isn't designed to map existing names back > and forth from other naming systems.
So you do not think it is realistic, for example, to have a document encoded in KS C 5601, containing domain names where the labels would be written using non conjoining Jamo. YA
