--On 2001-10-24 01.34 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If the goal is to get Unicode/10646 to endorse a mapping scheme between > Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese, whether as part of a > normalization form or otherwise, then that discussion belongs on the > Unicode mailing list (to which I have cross-posted this message).
Correct, but Unicode Consortium have already made an explicit statement to the IETF that they don't think such tables would be a good idea. So, the chances of IETF being able to convince Unicode Consortium they should create something they already made up their mind they will not do is what I would call minimal. But, you point out the correct process. paf
