> Is this better? Nope.
You brought up "how much V charges per name or B charges per cert etc and how much it would cost C to use it". I don't think these are relevant, and as your reply to LM Tseng was: > But the arguments for inclusive of TC/SC or not should be done on a pure > technical evaluation basis in IETF. Economy arguments as above is not a > factor for consideration. it appears that you characterizing a fundamental scaling property of any sequence of binary-valued tokens -- the 2^^N problem, as non-technical. You also wrote: > This is considered Layer 9 aka `political' issues from IETF perspective.. I don't agree. It doesn't change the scaling property to associate Verisign price points or bits of colored glass to the required user- and registry-acts and the stored state required for each if TC/SC isn't included. Eric
