-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- YangWoo Ko wrote: > According to Section 5. of last IDNA document (draft-ietf-idn-idna-04.txt), > "It(=prefix) MUST be recognized in a case-insensitive manner." > > I could not understand implications of that statement. Does it mean that > IDNA prohibit the use of case information of prefix for any purpose ?
It means that labels where the prefix characters differ in case are equivalent. (That should be true for any proposal that uses ACE, not just IDNA.) > For example, case information of prefix may be utilized as a parity check > for any purpose. No, it couldn't reliably be used as a parity check, because the case of an ACE label may be changed. - -- David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/ RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01 Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBO+53KTkCAxeYt5gVAQH+wggAoHHnC7sVaBpfLTeqgSRHQ+ZGe57Kwy7u +FtFHzzBe8g0uSNbwsFooZDJU7lvCiz2aNPe7Im9zH+oiPmzCXbs2qqBPnq/QL33 wJMdnvQ4CAO/2l/JvDQCcAqEpx3m8wWzgFQOmnwpiJfAjSV3SALgO98cXzbqLlP1 9JDQYwJHD9fc927yuSaxL11LWVyGrowOmbbfkfiycZz4ylio1g7tyObSmX2tcHxp 89QBdh36AIKWSXee4ag7xr0uxK3lLxTuTzduqVOcSE4Hjjj0SBE+L48tDnj2AouJ GIW9bQ9HqwagttxacWtl/V24OkvXxL6N+hzjYbjyOWAlcRdMwMt9DQ== =dq1G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
