-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Soobok Lee wrote: > Hi, Kent > Welcome to hangul problems. > You may have missed "hangulchar" I-D in WG pool. > Your analysis is thorough, but seems to be already addressed by the I-D.
AFAICS, draft-ietf-idn-hangeulchar-00.txt doesn't talk about this issue (equivalence of Jamo clusters) at all. Have I missed something? - -- David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/ RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01 Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBO/BjojkCAxeYt5gVAQHlWwf/X8oWkgtNXJhaP19we8WrCepf5Iwtb3Cp BiZtpd5NYDSKePMWjnibv6t8Dp+JxHxhY3Ea6RmHE8kF5+alYDiHjrNyvaBR9TqH Kf1+TwZurn39lsQiRoUydO5g5HJBg2GyXq8opbwqxsDvrGXmrEYGVuBP3aV8s3OG tBjQRbhDTTqNARjOdNRU/MWJFoqj+5faBhduAWZXD0NMvu5b3Gi+Eczd7nnADgdZ kboN2mTiHvXFRZHHmBOyDglF/GrqOH/mYdLuWDsqo4opwAq+o7kXGlGWnrRIRq4q hSHPSoQZ8h5o1zJFv5NDSDV45sQ8K6FqTjEUrXdIBuxg/h168WNVXA== =PD5A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
