Hi Liana, > > If what you only assume it a label seperator, then it can be treated > before [nameprep], as part of input buffer/user interface process, > then it has no need to be mixed with TC/SC insensitizing, or Latin > case folding. So do all other forms of label seperators, (though % or > $ is not usally label a seperator), may be treated in the same way as > "Chinese full stop" , thus they also excluded from [nameprep]. > > Liana >
It was first brought up by Eric H in this thread who said, " U+002E (FULL STOP) is ONLY valid for use as a separator when the IHI is written out". I thought it will be a good time to draw the same attention to the "Chinese Full Stop" for this WG to consider. (To clarify, I am most definitely *not* pushing for it to become legal data.) Thanks, Ben
