-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- "Eric A. Hall" wrote: > James Seng/Personal wrote: > > > within existing DNS mechanisms. Hence this enhancement to the DNS > > involves only end-user software. No other modules within the DNS will > > need to be changed. > > This forbids any methods for converting IDNs to ACE for storage in a zone.
... among other things, but yes, that's sufficient reason in itself why these sentences should not be included. > Those two sentences should be removed. I agree completely. - -- David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/ RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01 Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBPAKyxTkCAxeYt5gVAQFczQgArS9mYG/JLiiMauez4j8E0F+QTcJJ/PmK d7j4xMMmxpm4IC0S+MVD48Tv3EjtOu9bNg1nfoOZIvo3D+ZJye38Tew954CZNicU Qg09S0VELCoRPU76rtLOzJlj/S51XLnjK/LuJFK1iOyAlmRpp6cTFSN53Vjk2cZs SAbtcHpYQa0RXzbdJeHiuv1W9gXOVXVYvS6AgMY1o9XcavirRj2tNtcUb46BQ4ta XcUMGV6mB/LqrjnFJ6D/ZYegb3+AmsbDle4YMU2OMtm7hibCVtdFG4cFWIksc9uH MAfH5RtiNlU7kEUgpgVnPV3/236U/D/nYYeBP8pdY5BY3XrBp8U0gg== =jEvt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
