In a message dated 2001-11-30 13:43:35 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> And Chinese TC/SC example: > <wind> has four code points in Chinese: > TC, SC, TC radical, SC radical. This may work really nicely for cases like this, where there is exactly one TC character that maps 1-1 with an SC character. But what about all the other cases where it's not 1-1? And lots of people by now have stated that a partial solution is not desirable. > If the "equivalent character set" is not a good term to group > this codepoint normalization problem, I'd like to hear it. > No feed-back means agreeable to the term. I doubt whether the rest of the working group will agree with a unilateral declaration such as that. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
