Hi, Deng Xiang: In your [TSconv-02]:
In appendix C, we give the 1-1 Chinese variant table. My question is: Have you discussed implementation of the euqivalent set issue, such as the Radical section of codepoints are to be in this set ? or they are to be excluded from [nameprep] mapping? Liana On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 14:28:43 +0800 "xiang deng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 2:07 PM, Bruce Thomson wrote: > > > > > About the "SC/TC mapping strategy ", JPNIC,KRNIC,TWNIC,CNNIC had > reach > > > consensus in 7th JET meeting in Beijing. So the "validation" was > introduced. > > > > I couldn't find details of this on-line. Can you tell me more > about what was discussed? > > The subject of this meeting is CJK issue. During the meeting, four > solutions were discussed > Finally, the 4th solution was selected. According to the decision of > the meeting, we modified > the I-D (draft-ietf-idn-tsconv-02.txt), and rewrote it > (draft-ietf-idn-tsconv-03.txt). > > > Specifically, > > > > 1) Have the codepoint equivalences been established? Or is there > an easy way of doing so? > > It's depended on A Complete Set of Simplified Chinese Characters and > Dictionary of > Chinese Character Variants. > And the "validation" solution is acceptable for all attendees. > > > 2) How do the SC/TC mappings affect Japan and Korea, if at all? > > The "validation" avoid the interactive influence and do the best > respect to different opinion. > > > 3) How long would it take for there to be a draft to look at? > > We had submitted it and will send it to you off-line. If others want > it, I'll happy to provide it. > > Regards > Deng xiang >
