May I remind everyone that this I-D is not in the WG Pool _again_? So if anyone wants to discuss about this draft, kindly bring it offline away from the working group directly with Liana.
Liana, AFAICS, there is only one document in the wg pool that talks about TC-SC, ie, tsconv. And your documents are not one of them. -James Seng ----- Original Message ----- From: "liana Ye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:06 PM Subject: Re: Layer 2 and "idn identities" (was: Re: [idn] what are the IDN identifiers?) > The solution that I have descibed for TC/SC problem, > as well as associated CJK problem using lanugage tag > is in > http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-liana-idn-map-00.txt > > and phonetic encoding of IDN identifiers is described in > > http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idn-step-01.txt > > Updated versions of both will be submitted if I have > enough supports for the idea to be discussed and > developed in the group. I need 7 supports. > > Thanks. > > Liana > > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:14:20 +0800 "James Seng/Personal" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > To get IETF interested in a solution, there are typically two step. > > > 1. Conviencing the IETF it is a worthwhile problem to solve > > > 2. Presenting the solution to the IETF > > > > ...and conviencing the IETF it is a feasible solution > > > > james > > > >
