draft-ietf-idn-step has been drop from the working group after AMC-ACE-Z is decided as a choosen ACE. The topic on what ACE to use is as far as the group concern is closed. You are beating a dead horse here.
If you want to be the first person to be revoked posting right in this working group, you are very close to achieving that goal. -James Seng ----- Original Message ----- From: "liana Ye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 9:28 AM Subject: Re: [idn] idn wg proposed agenda > I'd like to raise another procedure issue: > Who is quanified to support an I-D to be in the core > discussion? > > For example, my draft-ieft-idn-step has 13 supporters > including me. Among the 13 there are 4 active > participants speakers on the list. The rest choose > to remain lurk now or not bother due to many > reasons. I used to work off line on this, and is > discouraged to continue working with people off > line. > > While others were never posting any message, > but it counted for voting. To speak about reasonable > judgement on who's opinion can be counted for > support is too vage for me to follow. > In my judgement, all the 13 are quanlified to support > the draft. Some people tell me, that they can not > answer all the questions that may be raised, so > they prefer to stay silent. Can the group comes > up with better guide lines? > > Liana > > On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 11:01:04 -0500 Marc Blanchet > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > James and I are proposing this agenda for the wg. This is a first > > version, > > please sent your comments to james and I. > > Because we are late, I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll update it > > with your > > comments. > > > > Marc. > > > > ============================================== > > Proposed Agenda, v1.0 > > > > IDN wg meeting > > MONDAY, December 10, 2001 > > 1300-1500 Afternoon Sessions I > > Grand D INT idn Internationalized Domain Name WG * > > > > Goal of this meeting: > > build concensus on the remaining items for the architecture > > > > Agenda > > 1. wg documents status: 15 min. > > > > 2. draft-ietf-idn-lsb-ace-02.txt: 10 min. > > summary of wg electronic strawpoll and decision. > > > > 3. discussion on next steps for: > > draft-ietf-idn-jpchar-01.txt > > draft-ietf-idn-hangeulchar-00.txt > > draft-ietf-idn-tsconv-02.txt > > > > TSCONV, Kenny Huang, 10 min. > > How to handle tsconv/jpchar/hangeulchar, To be confirmed, 10 min. > > Discussion and decision, 20 min. > > > > 4. draft-hall-dm-idns-00.txt > > discussion on next steps, 10 min. > > > > 5. WG next steps, 10 min. > > > > > > >
